I don’t think we’re in a clean bull market in 2026. I don’t think we’re heading into a full-blown recession either.
What I do think is:
We’re in a transition phase—where the macro is stabilizing, but leadership is narrowing and dispersion is increasing.
So instead of betting on “the market,” I’ve been building out specific, macro-aligned ideas—each tied to a particular view of:
rates
the consumer
AI spending
global liquidity
and policy
Below is how I’m thinking about these positions ceteris paribus—assuming no major shock breaks the system.
The Core Macro View Driving Everything
Before getting into individual ideas, here’s the foundation:
The economy slows, but avoids a hard landing. Rates peak and begin to ease gradually. AI spending continues. The consumer weakens unevenly—not uniformly.
Everything below flows from that.
AI Infrastructure Is Still the Cleanest Secular Trade
I keep coming back to:
Broadcom
Amazon
My thinking is simple:
AI is not cyclical—it’s structural.
Even if growth slows:
companies are still spending on compute
data centers are still being built
cloud demand is still rising
Broadcom gives me:
direct exposure to AI chips + networking
Amazon gives me:
AWS + AI infrastructure
plus upside from advertising and retail efficiency
The trade-off:
near-term margin pressure (especially for Amazon)
long-term operating leverage
I Want Exposure to a Rate-Driven Recovery (But Carefully)
If rates stabilize or fall—even modestly—certain names should work disproportionately well.
That’s where I look at:
Boeing
Armstrong World Industries
These are not “buy anything cyclical” trades.
They are:
high-quality cyclicals with embedded recovery potential
Boeing:
backlog is massive
the issue is execution, not demand
if production ramps → cash flow inflects
Armstrong:
benefits from renovation demand (not just new builds)
has pricing power + margin discipline
These only really work if:
the economy bends—but doesn’t break
Financials Are My “No Crisis” Signal
Owning:
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
is probably the clearest macro statement in this entire setup.
This position says:
I do not expect a systemic credit event.
For XLF to work:
loan losses must stay contained
liquidity must remain stable
capital markets activity needs to normalize
It’s not a heroic bet—it’s a confidence bet.
The Consumer Isn’t Dead—It’s Splitting
This is one of the most important themes I’m leaning into.
On one side:
Churchill Downs → premium / high-end consumer
On the other:
McDonald’s → trade-down consumer
And then:
Amazon
Coupang
which capture:
efficiency + convenience demand
My view:
The consumer doesn’t collapse—it bifurcates.
Higher-income keeps spending
Lower-income becomes more price-sensitive
Coupang: My FX + Logistics Efficiency Trade
This one is a bit more nuanced:
Coupang
I like it for two reasons:
1) Logistics dominance
fast delivery
high retention
strong unit economics
2) FX optionality
KRW exposure
If the USD:
stabilizes or weakens
→ Coupang benefits from translation tailwinds
So this is quietly a:
global liquidity + currency positioning trade
Defensive Growth Still Has a Role
Even with a constructive macro view, I don’t want to be fully exposed.
That’s where I like:
Primo Brands
Option Care Health
McDonald’s
These give me:
non-cyclical demand
pricing power
recurring revenue
This part of the portfolio says:
There is risk—but not enough to go full defense.
I Still Want Idiosyncratic Alpha
This is where it gets more “hedge fund-like.”
I’m also looking at:
The GEO Group → policy-driven
Pinterest → narrative + AI transition
These are not macro beta trades.
They are:
specific setups where sentiment and fundamentals are misaligned
In a market like this, I think:
stock picking matters more than index exposure
What I’m NOT Betting On
This is just as important.
I’m not positioned for:
a deep recession
a banking crisis
runaway inflation
or sustained USD strength
You’ll notice:
no heavy gold
no ultra-defensive tilt
no panic trades
The Full Thesis (Ceteris Paribus)
If I had to summarize my thinking:
The economy slows but holds together. Rates peak and gradually ease. AI remains a dominant structural driver. The consumer splits rather than collapses. The dollar stabilizes and eventually weakens. Markets reward selectivity, not broad exposure.
Where This Could Be Wrong
This setup is very dependent on one thing:
The soft landing holding.
If that breaks:
Financials get hit
Cyclicals roll over
Growth multiples compress
Other risks:
Rates stay higher for longer
AI spending slows
USD strengthens again
Conclusion: A Market That Rewards Precision
I don’t think 2026 is about:
buying everything
or hiding in cash
I think it’s about:
being directionally right on macro—but highly selective underneath it
That’s how I’m approaching it—for now.
LRSC Sponsored Note
This article is sponsored by Lake Region State College (LRSC)—a leading institution focused on practical, career-driven education across business, technology, and aviation pathways. LRSC emphasizes real-world skills aligned with evolving industries, including finance, analytics, and macroeconomic strategy.
Disclaimer
This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities. All investing involves risk, including the potential loss of principal. The views expressed reflect personal analysis as of April 2026 and are subject to change. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial professional before making investment decisions.
Michael Lazenby is the Editor-in-Chief and Founding Partner of MacroHint. He studied economics, business, and government at the University of Texas at Austin and has hands-on experience in investment analysis through his work with a hedge fund. Michael specializes in identifying macroeconomic trends, behavioral economics, and market movements that create real investment opportunities.